The second day of ARCHai SUMMIT 26’ continued with sessions that explored the relationship between architecture and artificial intelligence within a deeper and multi-layered framework. Throughout the event, it was emphasized that AI is no longer merely a tool in architecture, but an active agent transforming ways of thinking, producing, and researching within the discipline. The sessions addressed how AI can be positioned across a wide spectrum—from decision-making processes to design practices, and from theoretical discussions to research methodologies—allowing participants to develop a comprehensive understanding of the evolving relationship between architecture and AI.
Session I: Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making in Architecture
In the first session (11:00–11:45), Merve Akdoğan delivered a presentation titled “AI Decision Making: Bayesian Decision Theory and an Architectural Perspective” This session focused on AI-supported decision-making processes from an architectural perspective. Within the framework of Bayesian decision theory, the presentation explored how decisions under uncertainty can be structured in architectural design processes. Given the complexity and multiplicity of variables in design, data-driven decision models were highlighted as powerful tools supporting architects in evaluating alternatives and managing uncertainty.
It was emphasized that AI is not limited to design generation, but also plays a crucial role as a decision-support system in evaluating alternatives, risk assessment, and performance-based analysis.
Session II: AI Integration in Architectural Practice
In the second session (12:00–12:45), Ebrar Eke presented “Workflows with AI Integration in Architecture Practice” This session examined how AI tools are integrated into architectural workflows. Through practical examples, the transformation of design processes by AI technologies was demonstrated across different stages, including concept development, visualization, data analysis, and project management.
The presentation highlighted that AI significantly enhances speed and efficiency in architectural production, while also redefining professional practices and requiring new skill sets within the discipline.
Session III: The Future of Architecture in the Age of AI
Following the lunch break, the third session (14:00–14:45) was delivered by Architect Mustafa Kemal Kayış, titled “Architecture for Homo Deus” This session addressed the future of architecture in relation to the evolving relationship between humans and advanced technologies. Through the concept of “Homo Deus,” the presentation discussed how human-machine interactions are transforming and how these transformations are reflected in spatial design. It was emphasized that architecture extends beyond the production of physical spaces and plays a crucial role in shaping future modes of living and human experience. The changing needs of users in the age of AI were discussed as key drivers redefining architectural design processes.
Session IV: Artificial Intelligence and Design – A Research-Based Approach
In the final session (15:00–15:45), Assoc. Prof. Dr. Semih G. Yıldırım presented “Artificial Intelligence and Design: A Research-Based Approach” This session explored the relationship between AI and architectural design through both theoretical and applied perspectives. A key focus was the critique of AI-generated visualizations and the so-called “render-driven design,” emphasizing the need to balance aesthetic appeal with technical accuracy. Yıldırım highlighted that AI should not replace the architect’s role but should function as a tool that supports human critical thinking. He proposed a structured approach in which AI-generated ideas are filtered through the architect’s critical judgment and validated through technical analysis. The session also introduced an academic study comparing human-centered and AI-centered design approaches . The findings indicated that while AI provides speed and diversity during the conceptual phase, human expertise remains essential for ensuring feasibility, ergonomics, and spatial quality.
Furthermore, AI was discussed as a “research partner” in graduate-level studies, particularly in processes such as data analysis, literature review, and knowledge synthesis.
Student Participation and Interdisciplinary Engagement
The second day of ARCHai SUMMIT 26’ once again stood out as a student-driven academic platform. Organized by the Artificial Intelligence and Design Club, the event provided a valuable environment for both academic exchange and professional development. Participants had the opportunity to engage with diverse perspectives on the relationship between architecture and AI, fostering an interdisciplinary learning atmosphere.
A Strong Message for the Future of Architecture and AI
Concluding at 15:45, the second day of the event delivered a strong message regarding the role of AI in architecture. A common emphasis throughout the sessions was that AI will not replace architecture, but rather transform it. It was highlighted that the ability to effectively use AI tools will become a defining factor for future architects. Success in the field will increasingly depend not only on design skills but also on the capacity to understand and integrate emerging technologies.
With its second day, ARCHai SUMMIT 26’ successfully provided a comprehensive platform that encouraged interdisciplinary dialogue, active student participation, and critical engagement with the future of architecture in the age of artificial intelligence.
